Blog Center
  1. Home >
  2. Blog >
  3. Jaw Crusher
appeal (c) no.19445 of 2004 (state of uttaranchal & others vs. m/s. kumaon stone crusher)

appeal (c) no.19445 of 2004 (state of uttaranchal & others vs. m/s. kumaon stone crusher)

State Of Uttaranchal And Others Dr B.S Chauhan, J.— This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 28-5-2004 in Special Appeal No. 16 of 2003 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand

[email protected]
News Detail
  • Surat Singh v. State Of Uttaranchal (Now Uttarakhand) And

    Surat Singh v. State Of Uttaranchal (Now Uttarakhand) And

    Order. 1. Leave granted. This appeal, by special leave, is filed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Surat Singh v.State of Uttaranchal Criminal Revision No. 161 of 2004, order dated 23-3-2012 Utt.The accused person, the revisionist therein, is before us in this appeal

    Get Price
  • Dhananjay Malik And Others v. State Of Uttaranchal And

    Dhananjay Malik And Others v. State Of Uttaranchal And

    2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 16-12-2005 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital in Special Appeal No. 18 of 2004. 3. Special Leave Petitions (Civil) Nos. 1466 and 2743 of 2006 have been filed by the selected candidates

    Get Price
  • Nisar Khan @ Guddu And Ors. vs State Of Uttaranchal

    Nisar Khan @ Guddu And Ors. vs State Of Uttaranchal

    JUDGMENT H.K. Sema, J. Page 2298 1. These two appeals are directed against a common judgment of the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital dated 5.8.2004 confirming the order of the trial court convicting the five appellants under Sections 149, 302/149 IPC and a fine of Rs. 10,000/-; in default two years' RI. They were further convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act and Section 148 IPC and

    Get Price
  • Ashok Kumar Sharma v. State Of Uttaranchal And Others

    Ashok Kumar Sharma v. State Of Uttaranchal And Others

    Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari quash ing the order dated 17-2-2004 passed by the learned District Judge, Hardwar in Civil Appeal No. 99 of 2001, Smt. Radha Panti versus Ashok Kumar, annexure 5 to the writ petition. 3

    Get Price
  • Dhananjay Malik & Ors vs State Of Uttaranchal & Ors on 5

    Dhananjay Malik & Ors vs State Of Uttaranchal & Ors on 5

    1773 OF 2008 (Arising out of S.L.P ( C ) No.7989 of 2006) H.K. SEMA,J 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 16.12.2005 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital in Special Appeal No.18 of 2004. 3

    Get Price
  • State Of Uttaranchal vs Alok Sharma & Ors on 15 April, 2009

    State Of Uttaranchal vs Alok Sharma & Ors on 15 April, 2009

    Apr 15, 2009 9. The case of Vijay Kumar Joshi, respondent No. 1 in the Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 8239 of 2005 was decided first wherein having regard to the fact that he was appointed prior to the cut-off date, his writ petition was allowed by an order dated 03.11.2004

    Get Price
  • State Of Uttaranchal And Another v. Dinesh Kumar Sharma

    State Of Uttaranchal And Another v. Dinesh Kumar Sharma

    8. On 1-10-2002, the Government of Uttaranchal issued office memorandum conveying its decision of rejecting the claim made by the respondent. 9. The respondent filed Writ Petition No. 369 of 2004 on 21-11-2004 praying the High Court to issue a writ of mandamus to promote him with effect from 1995-96 with all consequential benefits

    Get Price
  • Uttaranchal Forest Rangers' ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors

    Uttaranchal Forest Rangers' ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors

    Appeal (civil) 4249 of 2006 PETITIONER: Uttaranchal Forest Rangers' Asson. (Direct Recruit) & Ors RESPONDENT: State of U.P. and Ors DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/09/2006 BENCH: Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & Tarun Chatterjee JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 7375/2005) WITH Civil Appeal No.u0005u00054250 u0005u0005u0005of 2006 (Arising out of

    Get Price
  • State Of Uttaranchal vs Rajesh Kumar Gupta on 10

    State Of Uttaranchal vs Rajesh Kumar Gupta on 10

    Free for one month and pay only if you like it. CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 672 of 2006 PETITIONER: State of Uttaranchal RESPONDENT: Rajesh Kumar Gupta DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/11/2006 BENCH: S.B. Sinha & P.P. Naolekar JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T S.B. Sinha, J. The respondent herein is

    Get Price
  • Sohan Singh vs State Of Uttaranchal on 28 October, 2005

    Sohan Singh vs State Of Uttaranchal on 28 October, 2005

    Appeal (crl.) 805 of 2004 PETITIONER: Sohan Singh RESPONDENT: State of Uttaranchal DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/10/2005 BENCH: B.N.AGRAWAL & A.K.MATHUR JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 613 OF 2005 Mahendra Pratap Singh Gill u0005u0005.Appellant Versus State of Uttaranchal & Ors. u0005u0005..Respondent B.N.AGRAWAL, J

    Get Price
  • State Of Uttarakhand v. Shamim Alam Khan | Uttarakhand

    State Of Uttarakhand v. Shamim Alam Khan | Uttarakhand

    2. The above-tiled application has been moved by the applicant/complainant on dated 23.09.2013 in the pending Government Appeal No. 305/2004. The said appeal was preferred by the State, challenging the impugned judgment and order of acquittal dated 03.07.2004 rendered by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar in Criminal case No. 2965 of 2000. 3

    Get Price
  • Devendra Kumar V. State Of Uttaranchal & Ors. | India

    Devendra Kumar V. State Of Uttaranchal & Ors. | India

    CIVIL APPEAL No. 1155 of 2006 Devendra Kumar (Appelant) Versus State of Uttaranchal & Ors..Respondents. Dr. B. S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 28.5.2004 in Special Appeal No. 16 of 2003 passed by the High Court of Uttaranchal

    Get Price
  • Stone Crusher In Uttaranchal-jaw Crusher

    Stone Crusher In Uttaranchal-jaw Crusher

    Kumaon stone crusher supreme court of india special leave to appeal civil no 19445 24889 of 2004 23547 of 2005 24106 of 2007 21868 22363 of 2010 12318 12530 21930 of 2009 26825 18094 of 2011 ca no 1007 of 2011 2047 of 2006 slp c no 2294 of 2008 11846

    Get Price
  • State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 26

    State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 26

    ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.7 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition (s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-07-2004 in WP No. 1124/2001 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) STATE OF UTTARANCHAL & ORS

    Get Price
  • State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15

    State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15

    [Giving rise to Civil Appeal (arising out of SLP No. 19445 of 2004, State of Uttaranchal & Ors. vs. State of Kumaon Stone Crusher and Civil Appeal (arising out of SLP No. 26273 of 2004, the State of U. P. & Ors. vs. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher.] 9

    Get Price
  • Arif Khan Agha Khan v. State Of Uttaranchal | Uttarakhand

    Arif Khan Agha Khan v. State Of Uttaranchal | Uttarakhand

    Arif Khan Agha Khan v. State Of Uttaranchal. 1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 9-11-2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/II Fast Track Court, Udham Singh Nagar in Special Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2003. convicting and sentencing the appellant to 10 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,00,000.00 (one lac) under Section 20/22, of the Narcotic Drugs &

    Get Price
toTop
Click avatar to contact us